Al Irvine
New Graph Environment Ltd.

250-777-1518
Date Original: 2025-07-25
Date Revised: 2025-07-28

Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship
and
Fisheries and Oceans Canada


Re: Scientific Fish Collection Permit Application

Please note that permitting to Fisheries and Oceans Canada is requested for inventory purposes only. PIT tagging is NOT proposed for salmon species. PIT tagging is proposed to the Provincial Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship (WLRS) for provincial jurisdiction species only to monitor fish movement and growth over multiple years.


A summary of sites proposed for assessment, including historic fish presence records from FISS, is provided in Tables 2 to 3. Fish species known to occur within each watershed are summarized in Table 4. An overview map showing potential sample locations is presented in Figure 1. A KML file (google earth) and GPX file (for garmin gps devices) of all sites is attached to the application with latest versions downloadable here or here. The KML includes detailed site-specific information accessible by clicking on each location in google earth, with brief summaries of background reports where available.


Brief description of project/activities

This work is a multi-year collaboration of many groups and an initiative of the Society for Ecosystem Restoration Northern BC. Funding for the project is through the Habitat Trust Conservation Foundation, Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure and the Provincial Fish Passage Technical Working Group. Al Irvine, R.P.Bio from New Graph Environment Ltd. is leading the fieldwork with field and office collaboration with teams from the Office of Wet’suwet’en (contact Julia Onderwater - or Dave Dewit - ), Gitskan Watershed Authorities (contact Alicia Fernando - ) and Gitsxan Environmental Services (contact Chaz Ware - ). Previous reports are provided below:


Rationale for sampling

Rationale for sampling is to inform fish presence/absence, species composition/density, abundance estimates, movement, growth, and survival as part of habitat confirmations and effectiveness monitoring related to fish passage restoration at barrier culverts. Habitat confirmation methodology information can be referenced in the above reports which builds on the Fish Passage Technical Working Group Phase 2 protocol. Presence/absence of fish, species composition/abundance, distribution limits and fish movement can be useful for prioritizing which crossings are a best fit for fish passage restoration and inform baseline as well as follow up effectiveness monitoring.


Methodologies

Sampling methodologies will be dependent on the site, fish species suspected, type of habitat encountered, risks to aquatic organisms potentially present (Table 1) and ongoing communications. Sampling methods may include minnowtrapping, electrofishing, and dip netting upstream and downstream of current and past barrier culvert locations.


Sampling is proposed at streams included in Tables 2 - 3 where we will be performing habitat confirmation assessments and follow up site visits related to past habitat confirmations/fish passage remediations.


PIT Tagging

As part of this permit application we are proposing tagging for provincial jurisdiction species only. PIT tagging is not proposed for salmon species. When time allows and tagging is expected to improve knowledge of a system, our study plan is to electrofish small sites both upstream and downstream of priority culvert “barrier” sites and implant Biomark APT12 PIT tags in the abdominal cavity of select fish over 60mm in fork length. To anesthetize fish prior to PIT tagging, we use a clove oil solution at 0.1mL/L (1:10,000), which provides effective sedation with minimal residual effects (Fernandes et al. 2017). The solution is prepared by dissolving clove oil in ethyl alcohol at a 1:9 ratio before mixing into water (Fernandes et al. 2017). Site location (UTM), fish length and weight will also be collected. In addition to providing information on abundance upstream and downstream of potential culvert restoration sites, the study will also provide information for monitoring programs to document fish movement, growth and survival at sites over multi-year time frames. Main objectives are to:

  1. Determine if fish are moving into restored areas
  2. Determine if before any remediation is conducted - fish are moving through sites where stream crossing structures (culverts) likely cause connectivity issues
  3. Evaluate if productivity of the systems are increasing following bridge installation and/or if fish are moving upstream/downstream of where replaced/removed structures are located


Dependent on how relevant tracking information would be to inform restoration actions, we may wish to tag select fish over 60mm in each site sampled. We would like to apply for a permit allowing a maximum of 600 fish tagged with a maximum of 150 fish/stream. Although we are requesting a maximum of 150 fish/stream, we have listed 150 fish of each species per stream because we will not know the species composition of the sites until the sampling occurs. In general, only salmonid and burbot species will be tagged with likely species present being rainbow trout, cutthrout trout, and dolly varden. Based on past assessments in the same and similiar systems in the region, the number of fish tagged per stream are very likely to be much less than 150, however we are requesting the maximum number of fish to be tagged to facilitate permit application procedures and allow for flexibility in the field based on actual sampling results.


Risks associated with project/activities and associated mitigation

Table 1: Risks and mitigation
Impact Mitigation
High Voltage Injuries Use the minimum effective voltage. Avoid contacting fish with the anode. Avoid electrofishing directly adjacent to metal culverts.
Disruption of Spawning Avoid electrofishing during highest risk periods in likely spawning habitat.
Physical Stress on Fish Quick/gentle handling and release of captured fish. Use of clove oil to anesthetize fish.
Injury from PIT Tagging Surgeries Shallow insertion of tags and use of fresh sterile syringes every approximately 10 surgeries
Mortality in traps due to predation and starvation Ensure all traps set are retrieved within 24 hours.


Please note that the sampling will be completed before October 31 (end of August till early October) however the end-date of the sampling period is listed as Dec 31 on the application to allow time outside of the busy field season for the data to be processed, QA’d and organized so that required reporting can be as informative as possible when submitted. An example of how we have been presenting results and methodologies from past assessments can be referenced in reports above.


Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need more information or have any questions or concerns.

Al Irvine, R.P.Bio

Location of potential sample sites.

Figure 1: Location of potential sample sites.

Table 2: Potential sampling locations.
Site ID Stream Name Watershed Code UTM Zone UTM Easting UTM Northing Watershed Group Code
123377 Thompson Creek 460-517700-00000-00000-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 641633 6049398 BULK
197640 Tributary To Buck Creek 460-636000-36664-00000-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 654312 6012383 BULK
197960 Corya Creek 460-185400-00000-00000-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 605786 6099884 BULK
197962 Peacock Creek 460-600600-07100-00000-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 643460 6025890 MORR
198064 Tributary To Lamprey Creek 460-600600-36400-26300-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 623369 6000283 MORR
198217 Sik-E-Dakh 400-448500-00000-00000-0000-0000-000-000-000-000-000-000 9 582874 6130541 KISP
Table 3: Potential sample site details
Site ID Stream Name Species Upstream # Fish Tags
123377 Thompson Creek CT;DV;RB 150
197640 Tributary To Buck Creek RB 150
197960 Corya Creek DV;RB 150
197962 Peacock Creek 150
198064 Tributary To Lamprey Creek DV 150
198217 Sik-E-Dakh 150


Table 4: Fish species recorded in the Fisheries Information Summary System within the freshwater atlas watershed group areas where the potential sample sites are located.
Scientific Name Species Name BC List COSEWIC Bulkley Kispiox Kalum Morice Zymoetz
Catostomus catostomus Longnose Sucker Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Catostomus commersonii White Sucker Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Catostomus macrocheilus Largescale Sucker Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Chrosomus eos Northern Redbelly Dace Yellow Yes
Coregonus clupeaformis Lake Whitefish Yellow Yes Yes Yes
Coregonus sardinella Least Cisco Blue Yes
Cottus aleuticus Coastrange Sculpin (formerly Aleutian Sculpin) Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cottus asper Prickly Sculpin Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cottus cognatus Slimy Sculpin Yellow Yes Yes
Couesius plumbeus Lake Chub Yellow DD Yes Yes Yes Yes
Entosphenus tridentatus Pacific Lamprey Yellow Yes Yes Yes
Gasterosteus aculeatus Threespine Stickleback Yellow Yes Yes
Hybognathus hankinsoni Brassy Minnow No Status Yes
Lampetra ayresii River Lamprey Yellow Yes
Lota lota Burbot Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Mylocheilus caurinus Peamouth Chub Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus clarkii Cutthroat Trout No Status Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus clarkii Cutthroat Trout (Anadromous) No Status Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii Coastal Cutthroat Trout Blue Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus clarkii lewisi Westslope (Yellowstone) Cutthroat Trout Blue SC (Nov 2016) Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus gorbuscha Pink Salmon Not Reviewed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus keta Chum Salmon Not Reviewed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus kisutch Coho Salmon Not Reviewed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus mykiss Rainbow Trout Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus mykiss Steelhead Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus mykiss Steelhead (Summer-run) Yellow Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus mykiss Steelhead (Winter-run) Yellow Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus nerka Kokanee Not Reviewed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus nerka Sockeye Salmon Not Reviewed Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha Chinook Salmon Not Reviewed E/T/SC/DD/NAR (Nov 2020) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Prosopium coulterii Pygmy Whitefish Yellow NAR (Nov 2016) Yes Yes Yes
Prosopium coulterii pop. 3 Giant Pygmy Whitefish Yellow NAR (Nov 2016) Yes
Prosopium cylindraceum Round Whitefish Yellow Yes
Prosopium williamsoni Mountain Whitefish Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Ptychocheilus oregonensis Northern Pikeminnow Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes
Pungitius pungitius Ninespine Stickleback Unknown Yes
Rhinichthys cataractae Longnose Dace Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Rhinichthys falcatus Leopard Dace Yellow NAR (May 1990) Yes
Richardsonius balteatus Redside Shiner Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Salvelinus confluentus Bull Trout Blue SC (Nov 2012) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Salvelinus fontinalis Brook Trout Exotic Yes Yes
Salvelinus malma Dolly Varden Yellow Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Salvelinus namaycush Lake Trout Yellow Yes Yes Yes
All Salmon Yes Yes
Arctic Char Yes
Chub (General) Yes
Cutthroat/Rainbow cross Yes Yes Yes
Dace (General) Yes
Lamprey (General) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Minnow (General) Yes Yes Yes
Mottled Sculpin Yes
Salmon (General) Yes Yes Yes Yes
Sculpin (General) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Squanga Yes
Stickleback (General) Yes Yes
Sucker (General) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Verified DV BT hybrid Yes
Whitefish (General) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


References

Fernandes, I. M., Y. F. Bastos, D. S. Barreto, L. S. Lourenço, and J. M. Penha. 2017. “The Efficacy of Clove Oil as an Anaesthetic and in Euthanasia Procedure for Small-Sized Tropical Fishes.” Brazilian Journal of Biology = Revista Brasleira De Biologia 77 (3): 444–50. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.15015.